Maybe log4j-iostreams?
On 2 September 2014 21:35, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, plain 'streams' is not great. Let's see... we are talking about > java.io classes that are OutputStreams, InputStreams, Writers, and > Readers. > > - log4j-java.io > Can you have a . in a module name like that without causing confusion, > it kinda looks weird but it the best IMO. > - log4j-javaio > - log4j-javaio-bridge > > ? > > Gary > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Using the name "streams" might be confusing the Java 1.8 streams (aka >> lazily evaluated functions/map-reduce). I'd almost suggest javaio or jio or >> something similar to emphasise the compatibility. >> >> >> On 2 September 2014 09:22, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Should the new module name/ID be: >>> >>> - log4j-streams >>> - log4j-streaming >>> - log4j-<your suggestion> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
