Much better Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 2, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe log4j-iostreams? > > >> On 2 September 2014 21:35, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yeah, plain 'streams' is not great. Let's see... we are talking about >> java.io classes that are OutputStreams, InputStreams, Writers, and Readers. >> >> - log4j-java.io >> Can you have a . in a module name like that without causing confusion, it >> kinda looks weird but it the best IMO. >> - log4j-javaio >> - log4j-javaio-bridge >> >> ? >> >> Gary >> >> >>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Using the name "streams" might be confusing the Java 1.8 streams (aka >>> lazily evaluated functions/map-reduce). I'd almost suggest javaio or jio or >>> something similar to emphasise the compatibility. >>> >>> >>>> On 2 September 2014 09:22, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Should the new module name/ID be: >>>> >>>> - log4j-streams >>>> - log4j-streaming >>>> - log4j-<your suggestion> >>>> >>>> ? >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> -- >>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>>> Spring Batch in Action >>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >> Spring Batch in Action >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
