Jim,
No actually not. I had not fully read the question previously. I don't think log4j is
designed for thread based logging. This had never come up before. Regards, Ceki
At 17:54 14.06.2001 -0400, Jim Moore wrote:
>Is multiple hierarchies the most appropriate way of doing this?
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:56 PM
>To: LOG4J Users Mailing List
>Subject: Re: Do I need to use multiple hierarchies, and how?
>
>
>
>Jim,
>
>Look a the SocketServer for an example of using different hierarchies. You
>have understand the rest of log4j pretty well before you use multiple
>hierarchies. Otherwise, it's pretty straightforward. Regards, Ceki
>
>At 15:21 14.06.2001 -0400, you wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I apologize, in advance, if this question has already been answered.
>If
>>> it has, please point me to the existing reply. I am using worker threads
>>> in the same JVM and would like each thread to maintain its own log file.
>>> Other than that, I would like to use the same categories and layouts.
>>> Only the appenders would be thread specific. Multiple hierarchies were
>>> mentioned in the introductory manual as an advanced topic. Do multiple
>>> hierarchies make sense in this situation? Is there an example of
>multiple
>>> hierarchy usage? Is there more documentation on this topic?
>>>
>>> Thank You,
>>> Jim Prokash
>
>--
>Ceki Gülcü
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ceki Gülcü
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
