I am encourage by the latest developments. However, I wonder why
Sun didn't just specify an interface and allow different logging backends
to be plug-in. That way developers can decide what implementation
they want to use. Sun did this with a lot of their APIs (Security, Sockets,
etc...) Can this be done? Is there some reason log4j can't be the engine
behind a specified interface? I am still a newbie with the log4j API (I
know
you can plug in different appenders) but I am no log4j expert and I
don't know enough about the innerds to know whether this is possible
or not.
Mabye someone else can comment?
Kent
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ceki Gülcü" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:18 PM
Subject: JSR47 vs. log4j (take two)
For the latest developments on the JSR47 front you might want to read:
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique2.html
--
Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
