In a different thread, Steve Souza said that log4j development had stagnated (my words, not his, re version 1.3). Is this true? If this is true, is it simply because log4j is a mature product and is a good product needing little ongoing development effort of significance, or is there a new/replacement product carrying the de facto logging charter into the future (e.g. compatible with commons-logging)?

Respectfully,
Wayne


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to