In a different thread, Steve Souza said that log4j development had
stagnated (my words, not his, re version 1.3). Is this true? If this
is true, is it simply because log4j is a mature product and is a good
product needing little ongoing development effort of significance, or is
there a new/replacement product carrying the de facto logging charter
into the future (e.g. compatible with commons-logging)?
Respectfully,
Wayne
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]