I heard that too, but it was from the author in response to purchasing
his log4j documentation -- a reputable, but not exactly unbiased,
source. I haven't heard any more about logback from any other source.
--Wayne
Arthur Blake wrote:
I thought logback would be the eventual replacement of log4j...
http://logback.qos.ch/
----- Original Message ----
From: Wayne Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Log4J Users List <log4j-user@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2007 11:43:28 AM
Subject: Great product like log4j stagnant?
In a different thread, Steve Souza said that log4j development had
stagnated (my words, not his, re version 1.3). Is this true? If this
is true, is it simply because log4j is a mature product and is a good
product needing little ongoing development effort of significance, or is
there a new/replacement product carrying the de facto logging charter
into the future (e.g. compatible with commons-logging)?
Respectfully,
Wayne
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________________________
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the
Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]