OK, in the following I denote foo.bar.XY as AppA and com.create.CR as
AppB and the test.bulk.ZY as UtilityC.
Possible solutions:
1. If the UtilityC is instantiated separatly by AppA and AppB (two
instances) you are perfectly done by configuring each instance with the
desired logger:
Config:
appender A
appender B
Logger "AppA"
with appender A
Logger "AppB"
with appender B
Logger "AppA.UtilityC"
with appender A
Logger "AppB.UtilityC"
with appender B
Code:
Use the suggestion of jake Kjome from today morning. The
constructor of SQLStatements wich receives the classname of the calling
class must then expand the logger name: receivedClassName + "." +
this.getClass.getSimpleName(). With this logger name you retrieve the
logger from the repository. If AppA had called the constructor, you get
the Logger AppA.UtilityC, and so on.
2. Supply the desired logger on each call to the UtilityC class:
public static void UtilityC.doSomething( Logger aLoggerToUse );
{...}
Drawback: The location info in the log statements would be the
location of the call to doSomething(). You can avoid this by using in
the UtilityC the generic call of Logger log():
aLoggerToUse.log ( this.getClass.getName(), Level.DEBUG, logMsg,
aThrowable )
3. Since the AppA and AppB run in different threads you could use a MDC
value within UtilityC in order to distinguish the loggers. Maybe in
combination with a own Repository-Selector which relies on the actual
values in MDC. Search the archive, this was discussed a lot, and I
supplied whole examples.
I hope you got the hint in which direction you should think. Otherwise
ask again.
Heri
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Camer38 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 5:23 PM
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: RE: "additivity" attribute does not work for
> user-defined logger but works for root logger.
>
>
> Yes, it is a typo.
> Should be:
> "I need two full log files for foo.bar.XY and com.create.CR
> with all the logs information from test.bulk.ZY"
>
> Yes the foo.bar.XY and com.create.CR are run in different threads.
>
> I want two logs files - one for foo.bar.XY and the second one
> for com.create.CR.
> All of them should have all the calls made in test.bulk.ZY
> (treat it as utility class)
>
> "Do you want the logs of test.bulk.ZY which were called by
> foo.bar.XY in the log file of foo.bar.XY and the logs of
> test.bulk.ZY which were called by com.create.CR in the log
> file of com.create.CR"?
> Yes. the foo.bar.XY and com.create.CR has some logging
> messages as well that needs to go to the right log file.
>
> Thanks for helping me with it.
> M.
>
>
> Bender Heri wrote:
> >
> > Questions see inline.
> > Heri
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Camer38 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:24 PM
> >> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: "additivity" attribute does not work for user-defined
> >> logger but works for root logger.
> >>
> >>
> >> But in my case I hit slightly different problem.
> >> The class foo.bar.XY calls lets say test.bulk.ZY and the class
> >> com.create.CR calls test.bulk.ZY as well.
> >
> > Do this two classes (foo.bar.XY and com.create.CR) run in different
> > threads? Or is it the same thread? -> Influences possible solutions!
> >
> >>
> >> I need two full log files for foo.bar.XY and test.bulk.ZY with all
> >> the logs information from test.bulk.ZY.
> >
> > Does not make any sense for me. Is it a typo?
> ("test.bulk.ZY" in first
> > line should be "com.create.CR"?). If so, then next question: Do you
> > want the logs of test.bulk.ZY which were called by
> foo.bar.XY in the
> > log file of foo.bar and the logs of test.bulk.ZY which were
> called by
> > com.create.CR in the log file of com.create.CR?
> > Otherwise you have to explain more detailled which log
> calls you want
> > to appear in which appender.
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/%22additivity%22-attribute-does-not-work
> -for-user-defined-logger-but-works-for-root-logger.-tp18259092
> p18319243.html
> Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
