On 09/20/2011 05:06 PM, Roy Chastain wrote:
> I have already written code that could parse the old datepattern and
> determine where ? needed to go to do the file directory search.  That
> code or a close relative can survive into the new model so, the
> directory search is still just a single pass with a mask.  I even fixed
> that mask to take into account the size roll increment number also,
> which is why I wanted to make fixed width.
> 
> I really think we need to provide for multiple name parts as proposed
> above.  I think I should be able to keep the performance acceptable.

Should I try to write down the API? It should be doable in a couple of
hours and right now it looks like I have some free time tomorrow around
20°°-22°°. If so, is there somewhere a sandbox that I could use?
-- 
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #################################
# Key ID: B469318C                                       #
# Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C  #
##########################################################

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to