On 09/20/2011 05:06 PM, Roy Chastain wrote: > I have already written code that could parse the old datepattern and > determine where ? needed to go to do the file directory search. That > code or a close relative can survive into the new model so, the > directory search is still just a single pass with a mask. I even fixed > that mask to take into account the size roll increment number also, > which is why I wanted to make fixed width. > > I really think we need to provide for multiple name parts as proposed > above. I think I should be able to keep the performance acceptable.
Should I try to write down the API? It should be doable in a couple of hours and right now it looks like I have some free time tomorrow around 20°°-22°°. If so, is there somewhere a sandbox that I could use? -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature ################################# # Key ID: B469318C # # Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C # ##########################################################
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature