Yay, you found the time! I'm not checking the source changes but only website stuff etc. At a first glance I found these issues on the web page:
* the download page is broken * the SDK reference is broken * Supported Frameworks still lists Compact Framework and .NET 1.0, is this intended? Maybe we should list in Framework specific notes that those frameworks have to be built from source? Cheers >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] >Gesendet: Montag, 9. September 2013 15:11 >An: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org; gene...@logging.apache.org >Betreff: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1 > >Hi all, > >after about two years it's more than about time to cut a new release. > >log4net 1.2.12 RC1 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net > (revision 2850) > >Details of changes since 1.2.11 are in the release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release- >notes.html > >I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt. > >The tag is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.12RC1 > (revision 1520872) > >Site: > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/ > >RAT Report: > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/rat-report.html > >Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1300 GMT 11-Sep >2013 > >[ ] +1 Release these artifacts >[ ] +0 OK, but... >[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... >[ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > >Thanks! > > Stefan
