why don't you write a fluent interface for it!?!? I think that for FREE software provided with SOURCE - it's a pretty darn good tool at a pretty darn good price - and so does the rest of the _whole_ industry - it being an _industry_ _standard_!
There are plenty of other loggers out there too - for free - open source - some good some not so good - all off the backs of some very hard work by some very tallented and commited people. w:// On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:48 AM, James Green <james.gr...@occam-dm.com>wrote: > Hi Again, > > Surely, this is all pointing to a far bigger problem. That is an horrific > piece of code!! Surely this is doable in pure C#? > > I'm amazed that this AdoNetAppender is so poorly documented and has so few > examples. It's starting to put me off log4net! > > James. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Ron Grabowski [mailto:rongrabow...@yahoo.com] > *Sent:* 15 June 2009 22:32 > *To:* Log4NET User > *Subject:* Re: Using AdoNetAppender > > This page shows an example of loading an xml string into an XmlDocument > then configure log4net from the XmlDocument: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4net/trunk/tests/src/Appender/AdoNetAppenderTest.cs?view=co > > ------------------------------ > *From:* James Green <james.gr...@occam-dm.com> > *To:* Log4NET User <log4net-user@logging.apache.org> > *Sent:* Monday, June 15, 2009 12:04:16 PM > *Subject:* RE: Using AdoNetAppender > > I think I'm going to have to try the config file method first. > > I'm wrapping log4net and I don't want to cause every consuming component to > require loads of config information in it just for logging purposes. > > Everything else is a sinch to configure in code, save for this appender ... > *sigh* ... > > Cheers, > > James. > > scanned by MessageLabs [www.messagelabs.com] > -- Cheers, w://
