On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Ivan Habunek <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 February 2012 11:09, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Florian Semm <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> If it's a "huge nasty piece", we can make a branch for it. >> > >> > Branches make me always a headache. >> >> me too. branches are no fun. >> Now... at infra is the so called "git experiment" running. We might be >> able to switch to git too. >> This would make some stuff easier probably, like having "release >> branches" or so. >> Cannot guarantee we are allowed to use git, but we could ask. >> >> Thoughts on that? > > > AFAIK, you can use git client to access svn repos. I haven't tried this, but > several friends tell me that it works very well. >
I have seen a presentation on git-svn and it somehow works, but you have to know the problems behind it. I would prefer to use the tools itself - if svn, then svn, if git, then git. > Frankly I haven't used git much, but I definitely have it on my to-do list > to learn. Some features sound very nice, local branching for example. > Especially since apache repo is so slow. Yep. It similar to me. I have used git a while, but I am far from a master. Working in a team with git was never important for me till now. Cheers > > Regards, > Ivan -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
