Am 12.02.2012 11:26, schrieb Christian Grobmeier:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Ivan Habunek<[email protected]> wrote:
On 12 February 2012 11:09, Christian Grobmeier<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Florian Semm<[email protected]>
wrote:
If it's a "huge nasty piece", we can make a branch for it.
Branches make me always a headache.
me too. branches are no fun.
Now... at infra is the so called "git experiment" running. We might be
able to switch to git too.
This would make some stuff easier probably, like having "release
branches" or so.
Cannot guarantee we are allowed to use git, but we could ask.
Thoughts on that?
AFAIK, you can use git client to access svn repos. I haven't tried this, but
several friends tell me that it works very well.
I have seen a presentation on git-svn and it somehow works, but you
have to know the problems behind it. I would prefer to use the tools
itself - if svn, then svn, if git, then git.
Frankly I haven't used git much, but I definitely have it on my to-do list
to learn. Some features sound very nice, local branching for example.
Especially since apache repo is so slow.
Yep. It similar to me. I have used git a while, but I am far from a
master. Working in a team with git was never important for me till
now.
I use git together with git-hub but always alone. I would be nice to use
it in a team.
