At Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:07:05 +0000, James Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [harking back to earlier post in thread]
> Complaining about Embperl being unsuitable for generating zone files
> is a little unfair, it is called HTML::Embperl! But yes, that
> flexibility would be nice - Embperl (used to, at least) make certain
> HTML-ish assumptions that broke my WML.
But this is my main argument. I write an article saying "hey look TT2
isn't just for web pages - you can use it for all this really cool
other stuff" and this chap replies to me saying "but TT2 only supports
a subset of EmbPerl's functionality" and then on further investigation
I find that EmbPerl is _only_ for web stuff.
Maybe my original article wasn't clear enough. Someone else wrote to
me saying "it would be nice to see you write an article comparing TT2
with other methods of dynamic web page generation".
Why are these people missing the point?
Dave...
