On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:57:27AM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: > David Cantrell sent the following bits through the ether: > > > Could you put the queue on a RAM disk? > > Or just use a lot of memory and a real OS? I think you'll find that qmail et al are specifically flushing the cache or preventing their stuff from being cached in the first place. I suppose you could patch qmail and take out the calls to sync(2) or whatever it's doing. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/ Good advice is always certain to be ignored, but that's no reason not to give it -- Agatha Christie
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer daemon ? Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... Philip Newton
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... David Cantrell
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... Leon Brocard
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... David Cantrell
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... Greg Cope
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer... Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... Greg Cope
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer... Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... Greg Cope
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer dae... Greg Cope