In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > for example, I wanted to overload == to tell me whether a list contained > a certain scalar - of course, now I can just do if($foo == any(@list)) > but using Q::S makes my code much slower, and using it in production code > seems rather silly. puts "Yessum" if list.include? foo <g,d&r> -- rob partington % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://lynx.browser.org/
- Re: Job (Parse::Perl) Leon Brocard
- Re: Job (Parse::Perl) David Cantrell
- Re: Job (Parse::Perl) Leon Brocard
- Re: Job (Parse::Perl) David Cantrell
- Re: Job (Parse::Perl) Mark Fowler
- Re: Job (Parse::Perl) David Cantrell
- Re: Job (Parse::Perl) Mark Fowler
- RE: Job (Parse::Perl) Lee Goddard
- Re: Job (Parse::Perl) Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Job (Parse::Perl) Rob Partington
- Re: Job (Parse::Perl) Jonathan Peterson
- Re: Job (Parse::Perl) Paul Makepeace
- RE: Job (Parse::Perl) Lee Goddard
- RE: Job (Parse::Perl) Damian Conway