In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> for example, I wanted to overload == to tell me whether a list contained
> a certain scalar - of course, now I can just do if($foo == any(@list))
> but using Q::S makes my code much slower, and using it in production code
> seems rather silly.

puts "Yessum" if list.include? foo
<g,d&r>
-- 
rob partington % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://lynx.browser.org/

Reply via email to