At 12:55 05/07/01 +0100, you wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > for example, I wanted to overload == to tell me whether a list
> contained
> > a certain scalar - of course, now I can just do if($foo == any(@list))
> > but using Q::S makes my code much slower, and using it in production
> code
> > seems rather silly.
>
>puts "Yessum" if list.include? foo
><g,d&r>
Now, now, I'm sure we'll have all this in Perl6. We will have all this,
won't we...?
--
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, +44 (0)20 7383 6092
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
