Paul, let me look into this and get back to you. Marjan
At 3:26 AM -0700 5/30/02, Paul Makepeace wrote: >cc: Marjan Bace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:59:40AM +0100, Paul Mison wrote: >> On 30/05/2002 at 10:06 +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote: >> >No, instead Manning collectively should be lowered onto a rough-hewn >> >wooden spike and sacrificially burnt to be set as an example to other > > >would-be book publishing spammers who harvest addresses from www.pm.org. >> >> Are you sure that's where they got the addresses from? Do you also > >Yes; I wouldn't be publicly accusing someone on a list with a subscriber >base of over 300 perl programmers without some evidence... It was a >tagged email address that only appears on www.pm.org and through which I >have never communicated (except with the pm.org domain, possibly) nor >submitted in a form. > >> regard the O'Reilly newsletter that started this thread as spam? (I > >The other term of course for spam is UCE, unsolicited commercial email. >I regard any message ("email") that I didn't ask for ("unsolicited") >that is trying to sell something ("commercial"), as UCE or spam. > >Having an email address on a website is *not* permission to send >commercial material. > >It is telling that one of the founders of Manning, Marjan Bace has his >email as a *graphic* on http://www.manning.com/about.html (see end), >presumably to prevent it from being harvested from their website! And >yet they're quite happy to use that technique to spam their "customers". >It's a depressing state of affairs when otherwise clueful companies >producing great products are doing this :-( > >Paul > >-- >Paul Makepeace ....................................... http://paulm.com/ > >"If lemons were fragile, then I will be green." > -- http://paulm.com/toys/surrealism/