Do the candidates for leader feel that their attitudes and behaviour to new
people in the irc channel are in line with the office of leader? Today we
were visited by a new face, who has been active recently on the mailing
list. Perhaps by virtue of some fault of their own, but probably due to the
prevailing attitudes on the channel, some people were pretty rude to the
new person.
One of those people is standing for leader of London.PM. My question is
this: Is such rudeness appropriate, and is such an attitude what we are
looking for in a leader?
I must say that I would find it extremely difficult to vote for somebody
with such an abrasive personality, regardless of their technical skills. We
aren't looking for a project manager, we're looking for somebody who will
arrange social events and be (where necessary) the public face of the
London Perl M[ou]ngers.
Just my tuppence.
/rataxis
--
S. Joel Bernstein :: joel at fysh dot org :: t: 020 8458 2323
"Nobody is going to claim that Perl 6's OO is "bolted on". Well, except
maybe for certain Slashdotters who don't know the difference
between rational discussion and cheerleading..." -- Larry Wall
- Re: Candidates' attitudes S. Joel Bernstein
- Re: Candidates' attitudes Richard Clamp
- Re: Candidates' attitudes James Powell
- Re: Candidates' attitudes lpm
- Re: Candidates' attitudes Natalie S. Ford
- Re: Candidates' attitudes Greg McCarroll
- Re: Candidates' attitudes Paul Makepeace
- Re: Candidates' attitudes [or why are you a... Dirk Koopman
- Re: Candidates' attitudes [or why are y... Peter Sergeant
- Re: Candidates' attitudes [or why are y... Paul Mison
- Re: Candidates' attitudes [or why ... Dirk Koopman