On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 09:09, Roger Burton West wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:49:02PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >Yeah, doesn't it suck when a list sets a reply-to? > >... http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > >Please fix this. > > That argument has been done. However, there is a middle way which > doesn't generally get proposed: the list sets a Reply-To: if and only if > there is no Reply-To: already present in the mail. That way, most > messages are automatically reply-to-list, but anyone who wants private > follow-ups can set them; it's the equivalent of being able to set > Followup-To: poster.
I think the latest versions of mailman do this. Also they fix Paul Makepeace's bugbear of not mailing those who are already CC'd. Mailman has some excellent, progressive features now. Of course both these features can be switched on or off per list. What it still doesn't do is to make reply-to munging a per-user option, that would be nice. alex -- alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> state51
