> Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Of course, this only really works well for static content. > > Static Content is a Good Thing[tm]. You should try to have as much of > it as possible. The you can let Apache do the hard work of implementing > HTTP correctly (caching, byte ranges, etc). >
Agreed. And it would be even better if all the content was pre-compressed (e.g., with a cron job: gzip -9 *) rather than doing it on the fly. I tried using Apache MultiViews to served pre-compressed static content, but to no avail. The idea was Apache would map a request for index.html to index.html.gz and serve the precompressed file instead. In the same way that language encoded files are mapped: index.html -> index.html.jp . Has anyone managed to get content negotiation to work for pre-compressed static content? ... this is the ideal scenario speed-wise. Nige -- Nigel Hamilton Turbo10 Metasearch Engine email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: +44 (0) 207 987 5460 fax: +44 (0) 207 987 5468 ________________________________________________________________________________ http://turbo10.com Search Deeper. Browse Faster.