James Laver writes: > Surely when it's something innocuous like plantain, we call it a > 'fritter' and the social stigma is taken away?
So does the existence of Spam fritters imply that Spam is innocuous and free of social stigma? Smylers
James Laver writes: > Surely when it's something innocuous like plantain, we call it a > 'fritter' and the social stigma is taken away?
So does the existence of Spam fritters imply that Spam is innocuous and free of social stigma? Smylers