On 8 Aug 2014, at 23:53, Sue Spence <virtually...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you. I didn't quite follow the last sentence, though. Daves and > Women are fairly well understood collections of individuals with no > observed overlap (so far). The other two terms are generally understood to > be roughly equivalent. :-)
I think he was asking how women stack up against Daves in the subset of “London.pm leaders”. Daves have almost certainly got that one nailed, surely? James
