On 09/08/14 08:57, James Laver wrote:

On 8 Aug 2014, at 23:53, Sue Spence <virtually...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you.  I didn't quite follow the last sentence, though.  Daves and
Women are fairly well understood collections of individuals with no
observed overlap (so far).  The other two terms are generally understood to
be roughly equivalent. :-)

I think he was asking how women stack up against Daves in the subset of 
“London.pm leaders”.

Daves have almost certainly got that one nailed, surely?

It's one-all surely?

--
Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk
http://dave.org.uk/
@davorg

Reply via email to