On 30/07/19 at 00:02, Simone Piccardi wrote:
> Il 29/07/19 22:52, Alessandro Selli ha scritto:
>>
>> LPI is the reference certification for many BSD people, too, and maybe
>> also of what are left of Solaris sysadmins, and backw^W faithful to the
>> old ways like they are vi is of paramount importance to them.  Maybe
>> also most AIX people would go for LPI for a widely known and appreciated
>> Unix certification.
>>
>
> I don't think the underline kernel or basic utilities make all that
> differences on the role of using a specific editor to modify
> configurations files, so I still don't see any reason for this
> "paramount importance" also for Solaris or BSD.


  Their systems by default come with vi and, IIRC, many BSDs only vi.

  Fpsense cannot have anything else than vi, for instance.


> Also in those systems is still far more important to know more about
> text filters than about the syntax of a specific editor.


  I never questioned that.  I argued against vi's removal.


>> Plus, mostly for historical reasons, vi must be available on any Unix
>> system and in fact AFAIK it is, even in distros that install nano by
>> default.  People better be aware of it.  Junior sysadmins often have to
>> put their hands on system other sysadmins, may be gray-bearded and bald
>> ones, have setup up to their likes. On these systems the VISUAL variable
>> might be set to vi, and VISUAL overrides EDITOR, as you well know!  ;-)
>>
>
> This is a reason to add the VISUAL variable to the list of the used
> terms and concentrate on the setup for choosing a preferred editor,
> not a reason to require an higher vi proficiency.


  I never argued in favour of a "higher vi proficiency".  In fact I
wrote I find the current content of vi excessive.


  Bye,


-- 
Alessandro Selli <[email protected]>
VOIP SIP: [email protected]
Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key:
  BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to