Il 05/08/19 15:48, Bryan J Smith ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:44 AM Simone Piccardi <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Sorry, but I strongly disagree, any sysadmin I know is capable to
use vi
to do the minimal editing needed in such cases, and capable to set the
editor he prefers for the rest. Nobody I know is using vi (vi, not vim)
for more than this.
All the proof we need to validate that is should be a very strongly
weighted item then, correct?
Sorry again for my poor english, but I'm not sure I'm understanding what
you are meaning here, but as I already said I strongly disagree on
having vi as "a very strongly weighted item".
To assess the capability to do minimal editing with vi one question is
enough. More are excessive (except if you want to use vi as a sort of
"rite of passage" like Anselm said).
There are many topics in LPIC-1 and lot of knowledge to validate, so
what to ask is a matter of weights. Giving more weight to vi means
giving less to other topics that also deserve validation.
Anyway I think we can stop, and agree on our disagreement over the fact
that vi should have more importance than text filters.
Simone
--
Simone Piccardi Truelite Srl
[email protected] (email/jabber) Via Monferrato, 6
Tel. +39-347-1032433 50142 Firenze
http://www.truelite.it Tel. +39-055-7879597
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
