Peter Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW: What about other distributions? Do they include and support SELinux? > Debian, Ubuntu, Mandriva, etc. If they don't, I don't see a reason for
To be honest, my approach to adding topics for the exams is more based on whether the technology is being used. Not just whether it's included in a distro. SELinux is definitely starting to come around to its own. I think it's just a matter of time. But, for example, the lack of adoption (in this case, mostly because it's so new and unproven in the field) is why we decided not to add Tomoyo to the 303 exam. > adding this to the exam. LPI claims to be a vendor-neutral certification > but currently it seems to me we are adding more and more Red Hat-specific > stuff. Well, I'm a little surprised to hear this. In this update, we added apt-cache, aptitude (yes, we added yum, too, but that was to catch up to the debian level on package management), xfs, more postfix (and less sendmail), We also dropped RPM config files and chattr (if you link ext3 to RH). In the 301 exam, we cover OpenLDAP and none of the FDS system. Can you be more specific on what leads you to the conclusion that LPI is getting more RH-centric? PS - I'm a mostly debian (server) and ubuntu (desktop; but really because I'm too distracted to care about my desktop) user. I was a RH user from the 3.0.3 version back in 1996 to 7.2 earlier this decade but our company transitioned to debian and now really only support RH when the client expresses a preference. PPS - I'm speaking for Starnix (not LPI). Regards, -- g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix care, toronto, ontario, ca phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20 http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
