Anselm Lingnau <[email protected]> writes:
> One might argue that including quirks from *all* major distributions is also
> a
> kind of distribution independence but then we can get into all sorts of
> nit-picking arguments as to the precise point where a distribution is major
> enough to be entitled to having some of *its* quirks added to the exams. I
> say don't go there.
Thanks Alan, Thomas, Ian, Anselm and Reinier.
Anselm, this was the most pro-cloneconfig argument of the bunch but still
ended with "dtop it" :)
I'm dropping it in the addendum:
https://group.lpi.org/publicwiki/bin/view/Examdev/LPIC-20x#Addendum_Apr_1st_2009
Regards,
--
g. matthew rice <[email protected]> starnix care, toronto, ontario, ca
phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20
http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
