Why can't you compare ? Why does everyone freak out when LPI is compared with RHCE ?
I don't see RHCE in any way as a threat to Lpic2 or the other way around and also I don't see any reason why one can't compare them. They both have strengths and weaknesses when compared to each other, they both relate to Linux professionals and both of them certificate one's competencies in Linux. The big differences are that RHCE is focused on RHEL while LPIC2 is covering both RHEL(and derivates) and Debian(and it's derivates) and the testing method (practical vs written exam). When I started this thread I didn't want to get in the philosophy discussion, I just suggested and wanted to know if there will be something above the LPI3 level of exams, and if this something could be comparable , for example, RedHat's top certification in terms of skills needed or the method taken to get it (like if you have an ammount of Level3 certifications then you automatically get the top one). On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Harald Maaßen <[email protected]> wrote: > It's not only the method, that differs. It is also a question of > philosophy and intension that matter here. > Thus you can't compare RHCE with LPIC. > > Best Regards > Harald > > > > On 29.06.2012 08:28, Alexandru Ionica wrote: > > > > > > While the method of testing differs you can't really ignore that at > > the end of the day most of the objectives one needs to learn/pass are > > the same. > > > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev >
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
