On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Anselm Lingnau <
[email protected]> wrote:

> > I've professionally found it's best to "educate" prospective
> > employers, peers and others on the value of LPI and the LPI Certified
> > (LPIC) program instead, including what the different levels cover.  I
> > don't try to define LPI in terms of Red Hat, that never does well.  I
> > define LPI in terms of its uniqueness in the industry.
>
> I agree with Bryan here. Chances are that if an employer specifically asks
> for
> somebody who is certified to RHCA level, they are looking for someone with
> specific and extensive knowledge of the Red Hat approach to things. This is
> something that LPI, as a vendor-independent organisation, cannot and will
> not
> deliver.
>

> If an employer asks for RHCA because that is the only advanced Linux
> certification they know, that is a different problem, but as Bryan suggests
> this cannot be solved by defining LPIC-3 (or whatever) in terms of RHCA. It
> may well be the case that an LPIC-3 alumnus might be much closer to what
> the
> employer actually requires, but that can only be ascertained by educating
> that
> employer about LPI(C) and how it works.
>
>
I haven't been in the situation to be asked about an RHCA but I think it
would be of real value if LPI would also have an "top" level certification.
Of course this is my opinion.

Also it would also be a financially better alternative than to the costs of
RedHat exams. I understand Brian's point that it is a big effort on RH's
side to provide hands on exams, I see their value (and I paid for one of
those) but also at least for me it is really expensive to follow that
path(personally pay this) and I also found it over the time difficult in
convincing employers to spend so much on training( and I have the feeling
this is more common in Europe than US) .

--
Alexandru Ionica , LPI 301,302,303,304 , RHCE
:)
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to