For Security I think Ldap matters a lot because it stores user credentials and other sensitive information. In large environments you're likely of encountering directory services( ldap based ), even if openldap is not the underlying technology but something else it still is useful knowledge and relevant to know Openldap.
For virtualization capacity planning may come in handy in large installations. On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Eden Caldas <[email protected]> wrote: > "Is the lack of capacity planning and > openldap essentials enough to prevent someone from being a > qualified/certified Security (303 exam) or HA/Virt (304 exam) person?" > > At least for security I don't think so. > > > 2012/10/11 G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Eden Caldas <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Ok good to know you are cornering them! >> > >> > I'm preparing for exam 303. It'd be sad If I fell confident to do the >> exam >> > but have to wait until rules change. >> >> The other way I'm framing it is, "Is the lack of capacity planning and >> openldap essentials enough to prevent someone from being a >> qualified/certified Security (303 exam) or HA/Virt (304 exam) person?" >> >> Any help from you folk on the list in making the claim that it >> shouldn't prevent certification would be helpful. Or the opposite, >> too. We do have to be fair about this. >> >> Any other rationale for keeping this simple, technical or otherwise, >> would also be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> --matt >> > 2012/10/10 G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:08 PM, G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > FYI, I'm still trying to corner people to get a 'ruling' on this >> >> > myself. From a record keeping perspective, I'd like to award people >> >> > with just the 303 or 304 the cert. The last time I checked, there >> >> > were only 15 people that would be affected by this. >> >> >> >> I should add but don't bet on it. ;) >> >> >> >> The closest equivalent of v4 LPIC-2 + LPI-303 >> >> >> >> would be v3 LPIC-2 + LPI-301 + LPI-303 >> >> >> >> where v3 is the current LPIC-2 objectives and v4 is the upcoming one. >> >> >> >> But I'll try the 'too many business/logic rules' argument. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> >> G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> gpg id: >> EF9AAD20 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> lpi-examdev mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > lpi-examdev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev >> >> >> >> -- >> G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> gpg id: EF9AAD20 >> _______________________________________________ >> lpi-examdev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev >
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
