On 19/10/2017 01:12, Anselm Lingnau wrote: >> I'm not sure I agree that xfs is worth a mention. If you need what it >> can do, it's awesome, but it always seemed to me a specialized fs >> outside of the normal and routine. Or maybe I just move in the wrong >> circles. > These days, XFS is a Red Hat thing in the way that btrfs is a SUSE thing. I > suppose that if you're running with Red Hat people, XFS will be more > important > than btrfs and vice-versa.
Lemme check something. By XFS, do we mean the very aggressively cached filesystem with a long history originally developed by SGI for IRIX? Or something else? -- Alan McKinnon [email protected] _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
