M. Drew Streib writes: > > I think the current spec specifies .rpm though, although I know .lsb has > been discussed. I assume for lsb 1.0 this can't change...? > > Also, the convention of dashes I'm using seems to be the way most people > do it, although this isn't specified in spec. I prefer it Anthony/Debian's > way. Does anyone else have thoughts on this?
I don't believe either of the above are specified at all in the main part of the spec. I agree its a good idea - is someone willing to provide a patch for the rpm source on freestandards.org (/pub/lsb/lsbdev) to do this by default? Chris. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group Canberra, Australia
