On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 08:00:57AM +0100, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 12:39:10AM +0000, M. Drew Streib wrote: > > > Anyway, I've got lsb-apache rpms and srpms at: > > > ftp://ftp.freestandards.org/pub/lsb/app-battery/apache/ > > mv lsb-apache-1.3.22-1.i386.rpm lsb-apache_1.3.22-1_i386.lsb # ? > Bad idea. lsb-apache_1.3.22-1_i386.lsb will break a lot of software > for maintaining RPM packages.
Does that really matter? These are LSB packages that just happen to share the RPM format, aren't they? Making it possible for users to tell at a glance whether they've got a real LSB package, or something specific to one of the the RPM distributions seems to me a much more useful feature than working with every J. Random RPM tool out there. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. The daffodils are coming. Are you? linux.conf.au, February 2002, Brisbane, Australia --- http://www.linux.org.au/conf
