Hi Amanda/All, I thought that there was an agreement to assign bit 0x00000010 for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x00000020 for draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding?
Thanks, Ketan -----Original Message----- From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-prot-pa...@iana.org> Sent: 04 July 2020 07:53 To: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> Cc: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <ppse...@cisco.com>; mraj...@juniper.net; lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ket...@cisco.com>; gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; aretana.i...@gmail.com; alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com; acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org Subject: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode Hi Peter, all, > > For both Peter and Gunter: the Flooding Request bit registration is > > described in the registry as a temporary allocation, but this may > > have been an mistake The RFC 7120 temporary early allocation > > procedure is meant for registries that require RFC publication for > > permanent registration. In theory, if the experts agree, permanent > > registrations can be made in Expert Review registries at any time. > > Would there be an issue with removing the "TEMPORARY" designation > > from that registration? > > please go ahead and remove the TEMPORARY. The "TEMPORARY" designation has been removed from the draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding registration in LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags, currently still assigned 0x00000010: https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs thanks, Amanda _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
