Gunter is on vacation...
Thanks,
Acee
On 7/6/20, 1:14 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-pa...@iana.org> wrote:
Hi Ketan, Peter,
I believe we're waiting for Gunter to approve as the remaining expert, but
we can move ahead if Peter confirms that we don't need to wait.
Best regards,
Amanda
On Mon Jul 06 03:46:02 2020, ket...@cisco.com wrote:
> Hi Amanda/All,
>
> I thought that there was an agreement to assign bit 0x00000010 for
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x00000020 for draft-ietf-lsr-
> dynamic-flooding?
>
> Thanks,
> Ketan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-prot-pa...@iana.org>
> Sent: 04 July 2020 07:53
> To: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>
> Cc: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <ppse...@cisco.com>; mraj...@juniper.net;
> lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ket...@cisco.com>;
> gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; aretana.i...@gmail.com;
> alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com; acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org
> Subject: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-
> ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
>
> Hi Peter, all,
>
> > > For both Peter and Gunter: the Flooding Request bit registration is
> > > described in the registry as a temporary allocation, but this may
> > > have been an mistake The RFC 7120 temporary early allocation
> > > procedure is meant for registries that require RFC publication for
> > > permanent registration. In theory, if the experts agree, permanent
> > > registrations can be made in Expert Review registries at any time.
> > > Would there be an issue with removing the "TEMPORARY" designation
> > > from that registration?
> >
> > please go ahead and remove the TEMPORARY.
>
> The "TEMPORARY" designation has been removed from the draft-ietf-lsr-
> dynamic-flooding registration in LLS Type 1 Extended Options and
> Flags, currently still assigned 0x00000010:
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs
>
> thanks,
> Amanda
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
