Dear WG, The draft in question does not describe even a single practical use case.
While it describes the mechanics on how to construct the new model of the abstraction it fails to prove we need it. Not everything which can be invented should be standardized or implemented therefore until the document extensively describes the real use cases with justification why use of areas may not be sufficient for such use cases I don't think LSR WG should adopt it. Regards, Robert. On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:17 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee= 40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > Based on the discussions in the last meeting and on the mailing list > regarding draft-chen-isis-ttz-11, the chairs feel that there are enough > differences with draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03 and in the community to > consider advancing it independently on the experimental track. > > > > These differences include abstraction at arbitrary boundaries and IS-IS > extensions for smooth transition to/from zone abstraction. > > > > We are now starting an LSR WG adoption call for > draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt. Please indicate your support or objection to > adoption prior to Tuesday, September 2nd, 2020. > > > > Thanks, > > Acee and Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
