Hi, I went through the diff with RFC5316. The changes look good. Some minor comments -
(1) Is it wise to use normative keywords MUST and SHOULD in the appendix? The text is from section 3.1 but can it be reworded in the appendix? Also wondering if other changes (IANA, nits) could be listed or we could call it "major change" :) (2) IPv6 Local ASBR ID and IPv6 Router ID is used interchangeably i.e. table in IANA section 6.2 does not use the same name as the table in section 3.1 Hope this helps! Thanks! Dhruv On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 9:00 PM Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote: > > Hi LSR and TEAS, > > This begins a joint WG last call for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis/ > > Please discuss any issues on the LSR mailing list. The WGLC will end March 3, > 2021. > > Authors, please indicate wether you are aware of any IPR related to this > document to the list. > > Thanks, > Chris, Acee, (Lou and Pavan). > _______________________________________________ > Teas mailing list > t...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
