Hi Tony, Ketan,
On 26/05/2021 18:40, Tony Li wrote:
*/[KT] Generic Metric is used for the links. When we get to the
computation of inter-area or external routes, we will need to get into
FAPM. The draft at a minimum should discuss the applicability of the
Generic Metric and its use as FAPM. Now, if we do make the Generic
Metric size variable (as suggested above), then we will likely need a
new TLV for a variable size FAPM equivalent?/*
We would need a new TLV regardless of the metric size as the FAPM TLV
only carries the default metric. We are not proposing that TLV at this
time. That’s future work.
we only need the new TLV to carry FAPM if we make the Generic Metric's
size variable. If we keep it fixed size, we should be fine with the
existing FAPM.
thanks,
Peter
Tony
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
