Hi Ketan,
On 27/05/2021 15:37, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) wrote:
For ISIS, Maximum Link Bandwidth sub-TLV is allowed in ASLA just that
different values for different applications is not allowed. Maximum Link
bandwidth is also allowed with all bits set to zero in SABM/UDABM or
each individual application bit set for all applications making use of ASLA.
*/[KT2] Yes, you are correct. The RFC8919 does not mandate or require
Max Link Bandwidth to be signaled within ASLA (at least that was my
reading). If so, perhaps it is better to not require that in this
document – just keep in the base. Would that not work? And if it were
advertised in the ASLA (as RFC8919 allows it), then perhaps a reference
to the RFC8919 will be important on how it is to be done – basically
exactly what you described above./*
given that RFC8919 allows the Max Link Bandwidth to be signaled within
ASLA, we need to be able to support it, in case someone uses that. What
we would probably need to do is to look at the ASLA advertisement of Max
Link Bandwidth first and if none is available fallback to legacy
advertisement.
thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
