Top posting for a different topic

My ESP, one of the larger ones in the world, is classifying most of the LSR 
e-mails as junk.  Yes,  I have reported them as not junk but doubt if it will 
make a difference.

To me it is obvious that anything with that well known abbreviation that was 
coined by ISO for their IGP in the subject line is going to receive 
unfavourable treatment so it may be that while many are  responding there are 
others who like me have an  ESP who is busy filling their junk folder.

Equally if I send an e-mall with that abbreviation it goes into a black hole 
with no MDN nothirng

Tom Petch

ps perhaps this is the considered opinion of the ESP on the I-D:-)

________________________________________
From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee) 
<acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: 12 October 2021 20:05
To: lsr@ietf.org

Speaking as WG Chairs:

The authors of “Prefix Unreachable Announcement” have requested an adoption. 
The crux of the draft is to signal unreachability of a prefix across OSPF or  
areas when area summarization is employed and prefix is summarised. We also 
have “ and OSPF Extension for Event Notification” which can be used to address 
the same use case. The drafts take radically different approaches to the 
problem and the authors of both drafts do not wish to converge on the other 
draft’s method so it is understandable that merging the drafts really isn’t an 
option.

Before an adoption call for either draft, I’d like to ask the WG:


  1.  Is this a problem that needs to be solved in the IGPs? The use case 
offered in both drafts is signaling unreachability of a BGP peer. Could this 
better solved with a different mechanism  (e.g., BFD) rather than flooding this 
negative reachability information across the entire IGP domain?
  2.  Assuming we do want to take on negative advertisement in the IGP, what 
are the technical merits and/or detriments of the two approaches?

We’ll reserve any further discussion to “WG member” comments on the two 
approaches.

Thanks,
Acee and Chris



_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to