Hi, Christian and Tony: Following your idea, the network will be filled with the large amounts of loop back addresses, will be one inextensible solution which has been discussed previously. And, once such loopack address failures, the nodes in other areas will also be notified. That is to say, such solution is not optimized both in normal situations and failures situations.
Aijun Wang China Telecom > On Jan 4, 2022, at 05:09, Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> wrote: > > > >> On Jan 3, 2022, at 11:23 AM, Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote: >> >> And I'm saying if a prefix is important enough to merit a bunch of new >> protocol extensions and state, then it's important enough to simply be left >> out of the summarization in the first place. >> >> And then people get what they want, w/o protocol changes/upgrades, and it's >> using time tested and hardened IGP code and designs. > > > +1 > > T >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
