Hi Lars,

We've just posted an update that includes the text as discussed:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-07

I hope that this addresses your DISCUSS.

Thanks,
Ketan


On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:44 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi Ketan, et al,
>
>
>
> *From: *Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 4:34 AM
> *To: *Lars Eggert <l...@eggert.org>
> *Cc: *The IESG <i...@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bund...@ietf.org" <
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bund...@ietf.org>, "lsr-cha...@ietf.org" <
> lsr-cha...@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, Christian Hopps <
> cho...@chopps.org>, Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com>, John Scudder <
> j...@juniper.net>
> *Subject: *Re: Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06:
> (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> *Resent-From: *<alias-boun...@ietf.org>
> *Resent-To: *Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com>, Acee Lindem <
> a...@cisco.com>, Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 4:34 AM
>
>
>
> Hi Lars,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your confirmation.
>
>
>
> Acee/John, I haven't received any response (objection or support) from the
> WG on this change. I believe this may be a good interim step until the WG
> considers any IANA registry reorganization. Can you please share your views
> as shepherd and AD respectively?
>
>
>
> The text below looks good to me.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ketan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 6:31 PM Lars Eggert <l...@eggert.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-9-30, at 16:37, Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In brief, the proposal was to introduce the following text in the IANA
> considerations:
> >
> > <NEW>
> >    This document updates the guidance to IANA for further allocations
> >    from the "OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV Sub-TLVs" [1] and the
> >    "OSPFv3 Extended LSA Sub-TLVs" [2] registries and requests the
> addition
> >    of this document as a reference to those registries. It requires
> >    that any document requesting allocation of code point from these
> >    two registries need to indicate the applicability of the introduced
> >    sub-TLV to the L2 Bundle Member TLV in that document.
>
> something along those lines would work for me.
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>
>
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to