Tony – I don’t want to start an argument – just want to set the record straight.
https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml states: “Note For IS-IS registries and value ranges maintained via the "Expert Review" [RFC8126] registration procedure, guidance for IESG-designated experts can be found in [RFC7370].” https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7370.html#section-4 states: “2. The Designated Experts SHOULD only consider requests that arise from I-Ds that have already been accepted as Working Group documents or that are planned for progression as AD Sponsored documents in the absence of a suitably chartered Working Group.” So what you say below is not correct. Les From: Tony Li <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2026 8:50 AM To: lsr-chairs <[email protected]> Cc: lsr <[email protected]> Subject: [Lsr] Adoption of draft-many-lsr-power-group Hi, I would like to formally request that we start an adoption poll of draft-many-lsr-power-group. I would also like to formally request code point assignment for this document. The relevant code points are all under "Expert Review" and do not require formal adoption before code point allocation. We would greatly prefer not to squat on code point values if we do not have to. Regards, Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
