Les, What I wrote is correct. Please read what you quoted. That's a SHOULD, not a MUST.
You don't get to raise the bar on a whim. Tony On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 6:36 PM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) - ginsberg at cisco.com <[email protected]> wrote: > Tony – > > > > I don’t want to start an argument – just want to set the record straight. > > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml > states: > > > > “Note > > For IS-IS registries and value ranges maintained via the "Expert > > Review" [RFC8126] registration procedure, guidance for IESG-designated > > experts can be found in [RFC7370].” > > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7370.html#section-4 states: > > > > “2. The Designated Experts SHOULD only consider requests that arise > > from I-Ds that have already been accepted as Working Group > > documents or that are planned for progression as AD Sponsored > > documents in the absence of a suitably chartered Working Group.” > > > > So what you say below is not correct. > > > > Les > > > > *From:* Tony Li <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, July 20, 2026 8:50 AM > *To:* lsr-chairs <[email protected]> > *Cc:* lsr <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [Lsr] Adoption of draft-many-lsr-power-group > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to formally request that we start an adoption poll > of draft-many-lsr-power-group. > > > > I would also like to formally request code point assignment for this > document. The relevant code points are all under "Expert Review" and do > not require formal adoption before code point allocation. We would greatly > prefer not to squat on code point values if we do not have to. > > > > Regards, > > Tony > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
