What do you make of Langdon Winner's work, arguing that sociotechnical artifacts have inherent "politics?"
Sent from my iPhone > On May 5, 2020, at 10:33 AM, grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Technology is but an agnostic tool. > There is no such thing as a liberation tech, > only applied tech via paths toward something. > One cannot apply a tech toward liberation > without first considering what a state of being > of actual liberation might variously be about, > to know where to go, what to make with the tech. > Democracy being nothing more than a > decentralized form of the murderous dictators > many claim to be liberating themselves or people from, > both forms hardly a state of liberation at all, > yet worshipped and profferred by all too many, > we therefore continue this random series > on path choices... > > How to be a tyrant. Sound Familiar? > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4LtEciQUF8 > > Deep Divers, let the balloon go! > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbX-Bvb2u_w > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_U3lEc-IFr8 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWLntHoTgDA > > -- > Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial > search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: > https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest > mode, or change password by emailing [email protected]. -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].
