On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 17:45 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Tuesday 09 October 2007 03:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:28:43 -0700 > > > > I'll now add remap_file_pages soon. > > > Maybe those other 2 tests aren't strong enough (?). > > It would be good if LTP were to have some remap_file_pages() tests > > (please). As we see here, it is something which we can easily break, and > > leave broken for some time. > > Here is Ingo's old test, since cleaned up and fixed a bit by me.... > I'm sure he would distribute it GPL, but I've cc'ed him because I didn't > find an explicit statement about that. >
Nick/Ingo, Is it OK for me to port this test case to LTP format with GPLv2 license statement for inclusion into LTP ?? Randy, Do you have any other test cases for this with you ? --Subrata-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
