On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:44 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Subrata Modak wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 17:45 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > >> On Tuesday 09 October 2007 03:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:28:43 -0700 > >>>> I'll now add remap_file_pages soon. > >>>> Maybe those other 2 tests aren't strong enough (?). > >>> It would be good if LTP were to have some remap_file_pages() tests > >>> (please). As we see here, it is something which we can easily break, and > >>> leave broken for some time. > >> Here is Ingo's old test, since cleaned up and fixed a bit by me.... > >> I'm sure he would distribute it GPL, but I've cc'ed him because I didn't > >> find an explicit statement about that. > >> > > > > Nick/Ingo, > > Is it OK for me to port this test case to LTP format with GPLv2 license > > statement for inclusion into LTP ?? > > > > Randy, > > Do you have any other test cases for this with you ? > > I have 3 small remap tests from Andrew Morton's ext3-tools tarball. > They are: rmap-test.c, remap-test.c, and remap_file_pages.c. > > Andrew's ext3-tools tarball file is in his > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/ directory, but I have > made small (build) patches to all 3 of these source files. > I can (will) send the updated versions to you.
Sure, that will do. Let us look in to that. --Subrata-- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
