Subrata Modak wrote: > On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 17:45 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: >> On Tuesday 09 October 2007 03:51, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:28:43 -0700 >>>> I'll now add remap_file_pages soon. >>>> Maybe those other 2 tests aren't strong enough (?). >>> It would be good if LTP were to have some remap_file_pages() tests >>> (please). As we see here, it is something which we can easily break, and >>> leave broken for some time. >> Here is Ingo's old test, since cleaned up and fixed a bit by me.... >> I'm sure he would distribute it GPL, but I've cc'ed him because I didn't >> find an explicit statement about that. >> > > Nick/Ingo, > Is it OK for me to port this test case to LTP format with GPLv2 license > statement for inclusion into LTP ?? > > Randy, > Do you have any other test cases for this with you ?
I have 3 small remap tests from Andrew Morton's ext3-tools tarball. They are: rmap-test.c, remap-test.c, and remap_file_pages.c. Andrew's ext3-tools tarball file is in his http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/ directory, but I have made small (build) patches to all 3 of these source files. I can (will) send the updated versions to you. -- ~Randy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
