Do you use Galeon with icewm? On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 13:30, Phil Driscoll wrote: > On Thursday 23 January 2003 9:11 am, Chris Puttick wrote: > > Its focus on lightness and speed (and therefore small memory footprint) > > probably make it ideal for LTSP users. > > I suspect (but don't know for sure, because I haven't tried it) that it might > be slightly less ideal for LTSP than Galeon because the Galeon user interface > is real code and hence gets shared between all instances, wheras the XUL > interpretation memory overhead is not shared, and also consumes processor > cycles. Perhaps its not such a big issue with Pheonix, but I remember the > tremendous freeing up of resources that moving from Mozilla to Galeon gave > us. > > Cheers -- respectfully, Joseph - (606) 477-2355 x140 ==========================================
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
