On Thursday 23 January 2003 9:11 am, Chris Puttick wrote: > Its focus on lightness and speed (and therefore small memory footprint) > probably make it ideal for LTSP users.
I suspect (but don't know for sure, because I haven't tried it) that it might be slightly less ideal for LTSP than Galeon because the Galeon user interface is real code and hence gets shared between all instances, wheras the XUL interpretation memory overhead is not shared, and also consumes processor cycles. Perhaps its not such a big issue with Pheonix, but I remember the tremendous freeing up of resources that moving from Mozilla to Galeon gave us. Cheers -- Phil Driscoll ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
